Body and Soul

Friends

'My life a wreck you're making

You know I'm yours just for the taking

I'd gladly surrender

Myself to you, body and soul'

-- Johnny Green

Billie Holiday sang it, Ella Fitzgerald, Frank Sinatra, Sarah Vaughan sang it, and the Johnny Green song is so familiar the piano, sax, and other instrumental versions instantly evoke it. 'Body and Soul' was a paean to romantic love, the blissful surrender of a man and a woman to each other, their mutual exploration discovering a greater self beyond selfishness, so fully immersed that one's happiness becomes the other's. The infant's possession of its mother's body replicates this romance in miniature. Only in such love, romantic or parental, does possession of another person's body exist voluntarily.

American society circa 2022 has been taken over by a cadre seeking to render love obsolete. Romance is out of fashion, pushed aside by the grotesque parodies advanced by professional perverts. And childbirth and nurturing are deprecated in favor of nobler pursuits like saving the planet. Children are an inconvenience to be handed off to daycare as early in life as possible. Love, if it exists at all, has become somehow illegitimate.

Yet love is an irrepressible human desire. Forced out of traditional family settings, it assumes the bizarre forms of contrived sexual identities that proliferate wherever love has been banished. And it gives rise to a new kind of prostitution-cum-sex-slavery where the john substitutes ersatz ownership of another's body for the voluntary kind that occurs in true romantic love. The other's body is acquired not by blissful surrender as in the song, but by chicanery, force, fear, or all three.

What could be more reassuring than a white-coated, stethescope-draped doctor who tells you to take a pill or a shot 'for your own good'? Backed by science, State-issued credentials, a pharmacopeia of multi-syllabic formulations, and vast labyrinthine buildings dedicated to incredibly specialized divisions of medical practice, how can you possibly question it? The doctor learned in medical school to treat the human body as a device that can be repaired with surgical or chemical interventions, and lately with replacement parts. Much of the content of his initial and continuing education, and of medical-journal articles, is provided by suppliers of the same pharmacopeia he is urged to recommend. They also provide travel junkets in attractive conference destinations. If 'conflict of interest' ever fleetingly crosses the doctor's mind, he reflects that he put in long hours learning his trade, works hard, saves lives, and patients' fees barely cover office expenses and the voluminous paperwork required for insurance reimbursement. In fact, doctors in solo practice receive an average of only 40 percent of what they bill.

The doctor-patient relationship is one of the few where touching another person's body is permitted by mutual consent. (Sports and musical instruction also allow purpose-specific physical guidance, which is occasionally abused.) Doctors palpate the body to locate sources of pain, swelling, or other abnormality as part of diagnostic procedure. We trust that everything physicians and surgeons do to us is in our best interest. In nearly all cases, it is, or has been. If the doctor-patient relationship is not exactly one of love, it can be a fervent attachment on the patient's part, born of the natural desire to enjoy good health and long life. Illness and injury, often combined with ignorance, create especial vulnerability which dulls or wipes out critical thinking. Fear of suffering and death moves patients powerfully toward passive acceptance of whatever remedy may be proposed.

Prospective illness or death -- which is threatened but not yet experienced -- adds a curious twist to this mixture of feelings. What usually brings a patient to a doctor is some immediately present malady for which a remedy is sought. Indeed public health officials often complain that people don't get flu shots, cancer screening, general checkups, they ignore warning signs, they eat too much, get fat, don't exercise enough, etc. So they risk opportunistic infections. Pathogens -- bacteria, fungi, viruses -- have existed since long before humanity arrived on the planet, and many have wormed their way into human DNA. They spread by taking advantage of human habits like breathing, eating, sweating, bleeding, defecating, coughing, and so on.

This is nothing new. All animals including humans have millions of them inhabiting their bodies. They are well-established, even to the point of encasing themselves in protective layers called bio-films, living off ingested nutrients, and hijacking cells for their own proliferation. They don't really 'want' to sicken or kill their human host, but if the 'viral load' goes past a certain point, then illness or death of the human host may result. Humans have developed very advanced and sophisticated immune systems to defend themselves against such unfortunate consequences. Macrophages engulf and devour infected cells, and the killer T-cells backups hunt down and eliminate circulating pathogens. These T-cells ingeniously retain memory of each particular pathogen so that they can quickly go after them again should the need arise.

So prospective illness or death is always lurking in our midst. Yet we go about our daily lives without worrying too much about it -- unless we are made afraid to such an extent that it invades our consciousness, and the fear displaces the feeling of healthy well-being that otherwise exists. In a society without love, or where love has been warped, with family life denigrated, friendships ripped apart by social controversy, natural groupings dissociated -- in a society of atomized individuals -- free-floating anxiety becomes the norm. Any fear and its associated call to action can be engrafted onto such grossly inflated anxiety. Illness very much like the common cold or flu, especially if propelled throughout the populace by enhancements designed to make it more virulent, is then primed to set off widespread panic. Among a people already isolated from one another, prone to regard everyone else with suspicion, the notion that some deadly disease can be picked up from *anyone* dominates behavior. In this collective state of mass anxiety, humanity becomes extremely receptive to whatever doctors are told will prevent the dreaded infection.

In response to the covid pandemic of 2020 - 20??, doctors were told by the suppliers of their traditional pharmacopeia that a new, experimental, untested genetic modification would do the trick. It would trick the human body into admitting a foreign substance which would normally be blocked, and then, like a virus, hijack the body's DNA to produce billions of spike proteins shaped just like the appendage the virus uses to attach itself to receptors in the linings of throat, lungs, and blood vessels. This, it was thought, would stimulate an immune response sufficient to destroy the target virus.

Unfortunately the drug designers forgot that viruses evolve very rapidly; pathogens, even lab-created viruses, are ingenious shape-shifters that get around the armies of static, unchanging antibodies sent to intercept them. And so, within less than a year after rollout of these clever mRNA shots, infection and death rates among the injected exceeded the rates among those who relied on their natural immunity alone. In fact, spikes in 'excess deaths' -- beyond the usual number -- track the onset of mass mRNA injections in every country. The mRNA injections themselves are damaging vital organs through freely circulating spike proteins irritating and inflaming them, sometimes fatally.

And yet public health authorities, mRNA-injection suppliers, and many doctors continue to recommend these injections, as if they were completely unaware of the growing body count. Actually they do more than recommend: They enact mandatory mRNA injection requirements into law, bringing the police power of the state to bear on the practice of medicine. Their justification, that 'this is an emergency', is wearing thin, and it is questionable whether it ever had any basis at all. In service to their perfervid but wrong-headed belief, they now (June 2022) seek to extend their mandatory though dangerous injection to children and infants, a group with a vanishingly small risk of death from covid. Doctors who inform their patients and others of these dangers are punished by governmental licensing Boards, up to and including loss of medical licenses and livelihoods. Ordinary citizens who share factual information with each other on these known consequences are routinely censored by communications platforms acting on government instructions. Everything is being done, it seems, to inject as many doses of this experimental gene-altering substance as people will put up with. No sooner is one shot proved ineffective and unsafe than its successor crawls out of the lab, as if memory of prior failure had been erased.

In California, known as a leader in technical innovation, another species of innovation is in progress in the State Legislature — control of the most intimate decisions of life and health. Lawmakers propose to require all schoolchildren in California to receive mRNA injections as a condition of school attendance, with no medical or personal-belief exemptions (SB 871 — insert this number into the link to find the bill); allow 15-year-old (and older) children to consent to an injection without parental knowledge or consent (SB 866); require all employers to certify that all employees or contractors have received at least two doses of mRNA injections, subject to an unspecified penalty (AB 1993); open up all private medical records for disclosure to any agency of government to determine injection status (AB 1797); designate any communication by a doctor about the development, safety, and effectiveness of mRNA injections contrary to CDC assertions as 'unprofessional conduct' leading to removal of licensure (AB 2098).

Whatever is going on here, it is not about public health, if it ever was. No, it seems that doctors afraid of losing their licenses are helping public health authorities and drug pushers gain absolute possession of masses of human bodies. Exactly why they want to do this, and how, is not yet completely clear. Some have speculated that people holding incalculably large amounts of money, together with politicians associated with the World Economic Forum (WEF), are out to dominate the world. The intellectual lineage of their notion that there are too many people in the world goes back at least to the Club of Rome in the 1980s, and before that to Thomas Malthus. The Davos set has become obsessed with killing off a third to a half of humanity, after which those remaining, including the Davos set, will presumably be happy. Corroborating data may be found in the rapidly materializing food and energy shortages, supply-line disruptions, racial conflict, failed states, possible nuclear warfare, and economic collapse, all of which are said to be the work of these malefactors waiting to pick up the broken pieces and reassemble them more to their own liking. Forced implantation of ID chips will make the California legislation requiring disclosure of private medical records obsolete, with the added benefit of a combined digital currency / social credit system enabling instant punishment of wrongthink or dopamine reward for loyalty. The mania for universal mRNA injection could be due to its being a proof-of-concept for universal implantation of implantable devices. All this is speculative at the moment. I can't confirm it, nor can I disprove it. It would be foolish to assert a priori that conspiracies don't exist, for that would be the same as asserting we know everything there is to know about what our betters are planning for us.

What is clear, however, is that romantic love like that celebrated in the song 'Body and Soul' is being shoved aside. Into the gap, the state is 'injecting' itself as everyone's de facto lover. Government acquisition of masses of human bodies, for as-yet unspecified purposes, seems to be the driving force of the otherwise inexplicable mass experimental injection campaign. It hardly need be said -- but let's say it anyway -- that this is the most complete form of slavery that has ever been invented. Ownership of bodies, combined with mind control exercised through the media to compel acceptance of demonstrably harmful injections, enables manipulation of vast masses of humanity toward virtually any ends at all.

They are after complete control of other people’s bodies. This is 21st-century slavery, to use other people’s bodies for medical experiments without their knowledge or consent. The motivation for these mass shootups is the same as for the mass shootings that have proliferated in America. As Rev Andrew Isker has written about the latter:

'Modern American society is a factory for psychopaths. The young man in the North American Continent is planted in a field fertilized by atomization, loneliness, and hopelessness. Many have never met their father, and most do not have anything remotely close to a “good relationship” with him. Most have no meaningful connection to the community in which they live, nor even the nation they inhabit.... They know (or at least perceive) that they will never know the love of a flesh-and-blood woman. They are on the kind of pharmacological cocktail that any premodern society would only ascribe to witchcraft and demon possession. They have nothing to live for and no one who loves them.'

The California legislators who would inflict the sort of cruelty on schoolchildren and others that they are proposing to enforce are possessed by a more sophisticated version of the same mentality as those who commit mass murder. Only the choice of weapon and the interval before death are different. Both are symptoms of the same anomie, deprivation of love, impoverishment of spirit.

Escape from this fate is as simple as reclaiming your body from the state and reuniting it with your soul and your soul-mate.