Hasty rollout 'at the speed of science', sloppy record-keeping, data contrived to fit a pre-ordained narrative, complete absence of informed consent, and slipshod storage practices show that medical research was never the objective here. The real experiment was to see: (1) How many people will risk injecting an untested drug into their bodies, and (2) What kinds of duress are required to get them to do it.
The results are in: 69% of world population has taken at least one mRNA shot.
Five-and-a-half billion people mRNA-injected -- why haven't they all been adversely affected? Expired or improperly stored, the mRNA is rendered inert. The injection site matters, whether in a vein or not, the composition of the lipid package, and a person's acid-alkaline balance. Individual characteristics matter. Contrary to the expectation that the elderly would be most vulnerable, young male athletes have become post-vax casualties at an unprecedented rate. Their hearts, already pumped-up during highly competitive, often televised games, cannot take another shot of spike-stimulated adrenaline. Autopsies of non-athletes reveal sub-clinical levels of myocarditis, as indicted by the presence of lymphcytes and macrophages (identical to those found at the injection site) in heart muscle where they do not belong. This is life-threatening, due to electrical disturbances causing severe arrhythmia and fatal variations in blood pressure. Yet the afflicted might feel fine until the problem worsens to detectable levels.1
Immune-system damage is likewise undetectable unless you look for it. Such damage is most likely to show up in increased susceptibility to new pathogens, re-activation of old pathogens, and prolonged recovery times. One form of immune-system damage that occurs is the substitution of one type of antibody (igG4) specialized in tagging foreign substances as harmless, for another type of antibody that tags them for elimination (igG3, via apoptosis or phagocytosis). Tagging things like dust or pollen or peanut proteins that one might be allergic to, as harmless, is useful to keep the immune system focused on what's truly harmful. Pollen doesn't replicate. You really don't want viruses and cancer cells to be tagged harmless and ignored, but that's exactly what the immune system does after repeated mRNA injections, because its stock of igG3 antibodies is reduced to zero after the third mRNA injection. Hence increased rates of viral infection and cancer.
But wouldn't such variability ruin the experiment? No, the real experiment is to find out how many people can be induced, persuaded, scared, coerced, job-threatened, pressured, tricked, bribed, or mind-controlled into taking an untested experimental drug that hijacks their immune systems into producing spike proteins in many cases more harmful than the targeted disease. The answer is, globally, 69 percent -- more in urban areas, among the well-off and highly educated, in totalitarian countries, and closer to the Wuhan epicenter, fewer elsewhere.
Such damage is most likely to show up in increased susceptibility to new pathogens, re-activation of old pathogens, and prolonged recovery times. But wouldn't such variability ruin the experiment? No, the real experiment is to find out how many people can be induced, persuaded, scared, coerced, job-threatened, pressured, tricked, bribed, or mind-controlled into taking an untested experimental drug that hijacks their immune systems into producing spike proteins in many cases more harmful than the targeted disease. The answer is, globally, 69 percent -- more in urban areas, among the well-off and highly educated, in totalitarian countries, and closer to the Wuhan epicenter, fewer elsewhere.
The other question on which the simulators sought enlightenment was what kinds of duress would be required to get as many as seven billion people to take an untested experimental drug. They understood that fear of death or severe illness would not be enough to motivate so many. Much more would be required to give these fears immediate salience. Elaborately produced rehearsals set the stage.
As early as mid-2017, Bill Gates directed funds from his Foundation to stage pandemic simulations involving military and intelligence officials. The Gates-funded SPARS 2017 exercise 'chronicled an imaginary coronavirus pandemic that would, supposedly, run from 2025 to 2028. The exercise turned out to be an eerily precise predictor of the COVID-19 pandemic.'
These simulations, over a dozen of them, clearly anticipated resistance. They prominently featured 'how to use police powers to detain and quarantine citizens, how to impose martial law, how to control messaging by deploying propaganda, how to employ censorship to silence dissent, and how to mandate masks, lockdowns, and coercive vaccinations and conduct track-and-trace surveillance among potentially reluctant populations'.
'Gates presided over a sinister summer school for globalists, spooks, and technocrats in Baltimore. The panelists role-played strategies for co-opting the world’s most influential political institutions, subverting democratic governance, and positioning themselves as unelected rulers of the emerging authoritarian regime. They practiced techniques for ruthlessly controlling dissent, expression, and movement, and degrading civil rights, autonomy, and sovereignty. The Gates simulation focused on deploying the usual psyops retinue of propaganda, surveillance, censorship, isolation, and political and social control to manage the pandemic. The official eighty-nine-page summary is a miracle of fortune-telling—an uncannily precise month-by-month prediction of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic as it actually unfolded.'
'In August 2019, less than 10 weeks before Wuhan’s first COVID cases emerged, another exercise called Crimson Contagion envisioned a 'novel influenza' pandemic originating in China. The simulation involved '19 federal departments and agencies, 12 key states, 15 tribal nations and pueblos, 74 local health department and coalition regions, 87 hospitals, and over 100 healthcare and public health private sector partners'.
One can only marvel at Gates' and others' uncanny prescience in guessing the exact shape of things to come. These exercises also notified officials of the vastly expanded scope of authority that would be expected of them. If any of them had any doubts about suppressing free speech, freedom of assembly, and other normal attributes of a free people, the very structure of the rehearsals precluded any such inhibitions, and prescribed military methods of dealing with them. The operating assumption was that an emergency would justify suspending the Constitution, no discussion needed. Thus the first stage of the campaign implanted a totalitarian mindset into public officials.
A final pre-covid dress rehearsal staged in mid-October 2019 drew in a cast of thousands including 'high-ranking [participants] from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the CDC, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former CIA/NSA director, vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the globe’s largest pharmaceutical company; finance and biosecurity industry chieftains, and the president of Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm.' One of the event’s simulations coached attendees on squelching any talk of man-made viruses or lab leaks.
Thus the first part of this experiment was to manufacture a consensus among influentials about the impending reality of a pandemic, and the severity of controls the emergency would require them to impose. It was a kind of training, cementing in place the already prevalent ethos of the political class that 'It’s us against them’. The next part was to shore up this mindset with data, starting with scary projections supplied by the specialist in that genre, Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London.
Professor Ferguson's trademark fact-free projections of millions of deaths and overwhelmed hospitals did not disappoint. His nightmarish scenarios softened-up public officials right around the world to accept emergency techno-diktats, no questions asked. Not one of these representatives of the public interest asked 'How do you know?' or 'Could we see the data your analysis is based on?' After all, it's not as if this computer-projection job-shop had a sterling record in forecasting other disasters. The climate-change hockey stick was exposed by a two-year-long lawsuit as a complete hoax, and yet fear still hangs in the air with every violent storm. Professor Ferguson evidently did not believe his own covid projections, as he hazarded several trips across London, against lockdown regulations, to see his mistress.
The actual covid that emerged in November or December 2019 in Wuhan China, arriving on cue in the United States in January 2020, resembled the very one the forecasters had warned about just a few months earlier. How prescient! So as the U.S. presidential election year rolled around, the general public was already primed to worry more about its own survival against this invisible enemy, named SARS-CoV2. Layered on top of this primal fear, exponentially reinforcing it, a global media campaign of unprecedented scope burst forth from all directions and from every source, the same message enjoining everyone to inject this experimental drug for their own survival, and -- most cleverly -- as a moral duty to protect others from infection. This obligation took on the character of a contagion very similar to the virus itself, potentiated by opportunistic infection, and readily communicated throughout the populace.
Among the various kinds of duress we have seen are: Coercion ('mandates' by government agencies that were legally restricted to advisory functions only), imposing house-arrest (lockdown) on entire cities, closing down small business and schools, prohibiting public gatherings and assemblies, threats of job loss for refusal to accept injections of experimental drugs, bribery of hospitals and doctors by public health agencies through their funding and grant-making powers, massive unrelenting propaganda amounting to cognitive warfare and mind control to monopolize judgment, computer modeling driven by pre-ordained conclusions designed to stampede government officials who are afraid of being held responsible for disasters that are forecast, de-legitimization of products competing with mRNA injections, de-licensing of doctors for recommending or using non-vaccine remedies that work, sponsorship of mendacious publications masquerading as scientific research, censorship of the slightest divergence from official narratives, and gross distortion of official hospitalization and cause-of-death data to align these with prior projections.
While 69 percent of the people globally and in the U.S. took one or two covid-vax shots, only 14 percent of those eligible in the U.S. through December 2022, accepted a third, or 'booster' shot.
Early in 2021 a Dr Geert Vanden Bossche (Netherlands) predicted the covid-vax would damage innate immunity, and so it has done. Now, more of the vaxed are getting covid than are the unvaxed.
The global campaign to inject all of humanity has shown that through fear, coercion, psy-ops mind control, and vicious censorship (averting informed consent), 69 percent of the global population could be induced to take an experimental toxic drug. Prior to covid, the 'Experimental Use Authorization' (EUA) status was reserved for drugs offered as a last option for dying patients who had tried and not benefited from fully approved drugs. The EUA designation had never before been used for a mass inoculation campaign. Pfizer/Moderna's take-home lesson from this real experiment may be that all they have to do to move their excess inventory is to re-enact the same sequence of simulations, projections, data-distortions, and fright-videos. The people themselves may take home a different lesson.
The evident disinclination to accept boosters suggests increasing skepticism in response to failure to prevent disease (else why would boosters be necessary at all?), and unprecedentedly large numbers of severe after-effects of mRNA drugs, including death. Popular resistance may also be related to reduced fear of covid. At the outset of the covid pandemic, traditional authorities quelled suspicion among about 70 percent of the populace. Three years later (December 2022), suspicion seems to have shifted to the authorities themselves. Government efforts to censor or cancel factual reports and views contrary to those presented by officials, plus efforts to obtain consent by coercion that could not be induced by persuasion, have only added to distrust.
Pathologists in Germany looked at the hearts of people who died suddenly at home within five days of receiving what they were led to believe was a harmless vaccination, and having no other health condition that could account for their deaths.
Dr John Campbell explains the findings here:
The peer-reviewed paper, 'Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination' (by Constantin Schwab, Lisa Maria Domke, Laura Hartmann, Albrecht Stenzinger, Thomas Longerich & Peter Schirmacher; Published: 27 November 2022 Clinical Research in Cardiology), provides more detail:
They found macrophages and lymphocytes in the (formerly) beating heart muscle, the myocardium, where they are not supposed to be. Interestingly it's not the heart-inflammation that killed these unfortunate folks. The pathologists examined the jab-site inflammation, and found it 'similar to the phenotype of the myocardial infiltrates showing predominantly, CD3 and CD4-coexpressing lymphocytes and D interspersed CD68-positive macrophages'.
In other words, that soreness in the deltoid muscle that typically follows the shot -- that inflammation -- can also occur in the heart. Those miniscule sub-clinicl inflammation sites in the heart muscle, which are not even big enough to be called myocarditis, set up electrical disturbances, leading to arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, blood pressure goes to zero, and... lights-out!
With typical scientific circumspection, the pathologists suggest that doctors and nurses be on the lookout for this sort of thing whilst their patients are still breathing. Of course, as they know, and as anyone reading this paper will know, this is solid proof of vax-caused death. Together with current epidemiological data showing, as even CDC admits, more deaths of vaxed than unvaxed people, and all-cause excess deaths ticking along at 10 - 15% above normal, what we clearly have here is not one, but two, bio-weapons -- covid, and covid-vax, both lab-engineered with the same spike protein.